Your insider is not particularly inside or objective. Whatever each appointee has said in the past is completely irrelevant to the present and future direction of Ukrainian policy under a Trump administration. Trump demands unquestionable loyalty. He wants yes men no matter who it is and historically thats what he gets from “Jaguars” to goats. Trump is going to screw Ukraine anyway he can. He has to in order to keep his loyalist and Putin happy. Plus, he resents Zelensky greatly. You’re deceiving yourself if you think otherwise. Remember, Elon Musk acts as a foreign agent for Putin and has gained an intimate, roleplaying position in Trump’s inner circle. Have you forgotten what he did with Starlink at a significant, potentially life altering point in Ukraine’s defense of itself? He disconnected Ukraine. I’m a boot on the ground here. You speak from a far. and your source doesn’t understand political nuance. Harris could make the same argument, that she wasn’t expressive about Ukraine because she would have lost more votes than she did. And “potential”, your “sources” term, is just that. It’s not reality. Finally, It’s obvious that your interest in our election results is born surely out of self-interest . You have no interest in the damage Trump will do domestically. Such sentiment will temper public support even further. That’s a shame.
Here’s hoping Lesia - thanks for sharing
I'm not hoping, I'm realistic. These ppl are difficult to work with but not impossible. Impossible is smne like MTG.
Your insider is not particularly inside or objective. Whatever each appointee has said in the past is completely irrelevant to the present and future direction of Ukrainian policy under a Trump administration. Trump demands unquestionable loyalty. He wants yes men no matter who it is and historically thats what he gets from “Jaguars” to goats. Trump is going to screw Ukraine anyway he can. He has to in order to keep his loyalist and Putin happy. Plus, he resents Zelensky greatly. You’re deceiving yourself if you think otherwise. Remember, Elon Musk acts as a foreign agent for Putin and has gained an intimate, roleplaying position in Trump’s inner circle. Have you forgotten what he did with Starlink at a significant, potentially life altering point in Ukraine’s defense of itself? He disconnected Ukraine. I’m a boot on the ground here. You speak from a far. and your source doesn’t understand political nuance. Harris could make the same argument, that she wasn’t expressive about Ukraine because she would have lost more votes than she did. And “potential”, your “sources” term, is just that. It’s not reality. Finally, It’s obvious that your interest in our election results is born surely out of self-interest . You have no interest in the damage Trump will do domestically. Such sentiment will temper public support even further. That’s a shame.
Ok, I'll only listen to you from now on, and will never ask anyone on Capitol Hill for any opinion or insights!
😂🤷♀️You said it I didn’t👍