Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JG's avatar

Your story at the end is good, regards 1943 and the Soviet advance that eventually took them beyond Ukraine itself and all the way to Berlin.

The Soviets did indeed have massive man and material resources that dwarfed those of Nazi Germany. By simply grit and taking horrendous casualties they forced the crossing.

However, this is 2025 and Russia is not the USSR of 1943. They do not have the same men and material resources, or even the same incentives (Russian soldiers are there for the money), they don't have lend-lease (North Korea and Iran are poor allies), they don't even have the armoured vehicles for a rapid advance and exploitation (advancing on electric scooters isn't a good look)

And more importantly, Nazi Germanies allies were few. Ukraine has Europe and whilst as frustrating provision has been, they are still being actively supported.

Yes it looks dangerous on a map and it's not easy for the troops on the front. But the Russian's can advance only so far, then catchup logistics fail. Ukraine, for all it's manpower shortages, can shift it's troops with greater speed and hit Russian advances, whilst still being better supported logistically.

Plus, if it were me, I'm looking at that thin sliver of an advance and thinking "flank them, cut them off, and they're done". Advance contained.

It's scary looking, but it's not the end, not even close.

Expand full comment
Wouter's avatar
7dEdited

“no helmet, vest or weapons then beg for water and surrender.”

Good, if this is the case, I bet the Russia will surrender soon. Ukraine doesn’t need weapons and money anymore, they won.

Oh right, the Russians are winning? Exactly, this article is one large piece of bad propaganda.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts